Legal Opinion

Tube-Mac Industries, Inc. v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 25, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00197Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division TUBE-MAC INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2:20CV197 (RCY) ) STEVE CAMPBELL and ) TRANZGAZ, INC., ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendants for Correction of Inventorship of United States Patent No. 9,376,049 B2 (“’049 Patent”). (ECF 1, at 7-8.) Plaintiffs contend that Gary Mackay and Dan Hewson should be added as inventors on the ’049 Patent and several related foreign patents (“the patents-in-suit”). (Id. at 7.) The Court held a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API