Legal Opinion

Facchine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this workers’ compensation case we are asked to enforce an oral settlement agreement where the injured worker died before the agreement was written, signed and approved. Sylvio M. Facchine (Deceased) through Barbara Spinda (Executrix), Deceased’s niece and executrix of his estate, challenges an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that denied a petition seeking approval of a compromise and release agreement (C & R Agreement). Because the statutory requirements for approval of the C & R Agreement were not satisfied, we affirm.

The underlying facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Blessing v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Rissmiller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Lebid v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Stoltzfus v. Zoning Hearing Board of Eden TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Stoltzfus v. Zoning Hearing Board of Eden TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API