Legal Opinion

Rissmiller v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEADBETTER, Judge.

Petitioner claims in this appeal that an oral agreement to settle a workers’ compensation subrogation dispute is enforceable. Based upon both the applicable statute and recent caselaw, we hold that it is not, and thus affirm the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board).

In 1995, claimant Horace B. Rissmiller suffered a work-related motor vehicle accident for which he received temporary total disability benefits of $509 per week. Claimant, meanwhile, filed claims against the third party tortfeasor and his employer’s underinsured motorist carrier. Those claims…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blessing v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lebid v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Facchine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Fratta v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. A. Griffis v. WCAB (Albert Einstein Healthcare Network)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Lebid v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API