Legal Opinion

Greer v. Arlington Mills Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 10, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action on the .case (Nos. 136 and 137—consolidated—Feb-ruary Term, 1898). See facts in the charge of court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewiel, J.,

charging the jury :

Gentlemen of the jury:—John Greer, the plaintiff in this suit, alleges that he entered into a contract or agreement with the Arlington Mills Manufacturing Company, the defendant, on March 17, 1886, under which he was to receive $5000.00 a year for his services as manager of said Arlington Mills Manufacturing Company, and that in pursuance of said contract, he, the plaintiff, did act as said manager from March 17, 1886, up to about the last of the year, in December, 1896, at which time he was discharged by the defendant without any sufficient cause and without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Tatterson v. Suffolk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Prentiss v. LedyardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. De Briar v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Singh v. Cities Service Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API