De Briar v. Minturn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of the third judicial district, where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The facts will be found in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bennett, J.
The defendant was an innkeeper, He employed the plaintiff as a barkeeper, and was to give him three hundred dollars per month for his services, and allow him the privilege of occupying a room so long as he remained in the plaintiff’s employ. The plaintiff was not hired for any definite period, and lie was discharged by the defendants After such discharge, the defendant notified the plaintiff to leave the room which he occupied, at the end of the month. The plaintiff did not comply with the notice, and the defendant put him out of the house by force; and this action is…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Tipsword v. PotterIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Russell & Axon v. HandshoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Speeder Cycle Co. v. TeeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. WillettSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.