Legal Opinion
James v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 31, 1987No. A-1154PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
COATS, Judge.
In James v. State, 730 P.2d 811 (Alaska App.1987) (James I), we reversed James’ conviction, finding that the record did not adequately indicate that James knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. Id. at 815. The state filed a petition for rehearing and asked to supplement the appellate record with a transcript of James’ initial arraignment in district court. We allowed the state to supplement the record and the parties have filed briefs commenting on the record as supplemented. We granted the petition for rehearing.
The record of James’ initial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. AndrewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- McIntire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- Shorthill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- Steven Michael Hinshaw v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.