Criddle v. Board of Commissioners
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.
C. S., sec. 3699, makes it the duty of the board of county commissioners, at its April session, next preceding any general election, to “fix” the annual salaries of the various county officers, except prosecuting attorney, for the term commencing on the second Monday in January after such session, and prohibits the board from fixing the salary of any such officer in a greater sum than the maximum or less than the minimum therein stated. At the April, 1924, session, the board of commissioners of Bonneville county fixed the salaries of all the county officers named in the section, except…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Murray v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Planting v. Board of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Huffaker v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Dygert v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Lambing v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Etter v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.