Legal Opinion

Davidson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1922No. A-3589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BESSÉY, J.

The plaintiff in error, herein referred to as the defendant, at the time of the offense charged was a man of the age of 70 years, residing with his wife and children in Cad-do county, about seven miles from Carnegie. The record shows that he had hitherto been a man of good character, who had in previous years been county clerk and county superintend-ent of schools in adjoining counties.

The defendant testified that he was affected with prostitis, and that he went into the park, as he supposed and intended, to a secluded spot, to relieve himself.

The evidence on the part of the state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Bunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Wollaston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. O'NEAL v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Berryhill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API