Bunn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The defendant, Saul Bunn, was charged by information filed in the district court of Oklahoma county with the crime of indecent exposure, was tried to a jury who returned a verdict of guilty, but left the punishment to be assessed to the discretion of the trial court. The defendant was thereupon sentenced to serve a term of five years imprisonment in the State Penitentiary and has appealed.
The principal assignment of error presented by counsel for defendant is their contention that the court erred in admitting in evidence over objections of the defendant other alleged acts of indecent exposure…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pressley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Nemecek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Turnbow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Rhine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.