Legal Opinion
Marvin Hayes Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 20, 1987No. 85-5911PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Marvin Hayes Lines, Inc. (Hayes), is a motor common carrier operating in interstate commerce. The defendant, Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (Fund), is a multiemployer pension plan within the definition of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(37) and 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Hayes had a collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Freight Employees Local Union 480 of Nashville, Tennessee (Local 480). Pursuant to this agreement, Hayes was required to make defined contributions to the fund.
On May 11, 1982, local 480 struck Hayes. On this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Usaco Coal Company v. Carbomin Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan a v. Cooper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- T.I.M.E.-DC, Inc. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Schulze Tool & Die Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
3Cited by51 opinions
- Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 v. Centra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. t.i.m.e.-dc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.