Cody James Fortin v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMelanson, Chief Judge
Cody James Fortin appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In 2009, the state charged Fortin with aggravated battery (I.C. §§ 18-903(a), 18-907(a), and 18-907(b)) and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a crime (I.C. § 19-2520). A jury found Fortin guilty. For-tin was sentenced to a unified term of twenty-five years, with a minimum period of confinement of twelve years. This Court later affirmed Fortin’s judgment of conviction in an unpublished opinion. State v.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Savage v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Andrus v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
- Jeremy Steven Meredith v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
- Martin Edmo Ish v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.