Legal Opinion

Apgar v. Commercial Union Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 23, 1996PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Samuel Apgar and Christine Apgar appeal from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) in favor of Commercial Union Insurance Company and Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company on the Apgars’ complaint seeking underinsured motorists coverage for damages arising from an automobile accident involving Christine. The Apgars contend the trial court erroneously determined, as a matter of law, that the Ap-gars’ injuries are not covered by the underin-sured motorists provisions of the insurance policy issued by Commercial Union.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Peerless Insurance Co. v. BrennonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Brackett v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Johnson v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. American Protection Insurance v. Acadia Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Jack v. TracySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Bores v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Foundation for Blood Research v. St. Paul Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. Korhonen v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API