Legal Opinion

W. E. Neal Son v. Panhandle S. F. Ry.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1922No. 2037Published

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

NeaL & Son sued defendant in error, railway company, to recover $3,248 with interest, as damages alleged to have resulted to a carload of Perdieron horses, shipped by plaintiffs from Dallas, Tex., to Dawn, Tex., via the Texas & Pacific Railway Company to Sweetwater; thence over the defendant in error’s line to Dawn. The original petition-alleges that the shipment was unnecessarily and negligently delayed, roughly handled, unnecessarily switched and jerked, that the horses were negligently kept on the car without being unloaded, and as a result of such -negligence one of the animals died and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. FaganTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Texas Central Railroad v. G. W. Hunter & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Ackermann v. AckermannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API