Legal Opinion

Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2002No. 23053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

WATANABE, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal 1 is whether the Family Court of the First Circuit (the first circuit family court) abused its discretion when it denied a motion by Defendant-Appellant Jane Doe (Grandmother) that sought, among other relief, to: (1) set aside the paternity judgment (the Paternity Judgment) that determined, based on genetic test results stipulated into evidence by the parties, that her deceased son (Putative Father) was the biological father of Daughter, a child born to Defendant-Appellee Jane Roe (Mother) after Putative Father’s death;…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ka'u Agribusiness Co. v. Heirs of AhulauHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Child Support Enforcement Agency v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ka'u Agribusiness Co. v. Heirs of AhulauHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API