Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1985No. 860-83PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

ONION, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, to-wit: cocaine. See Article 4476-15, § 1.02(8), V.A.C.S. The punishment was assessed by the jury, upon appellant’s plea of guilty, at six (6) years’ imprisonment.

The indictment alleged in pertinent part that appellant King on or about January 17, 1980, “did then and there knowingly and intentionally deliver to James D. Hum-phreys a controlled substance, to wit: cocaine. ...”

Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment alleging it failed to set forth…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Broddus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API