Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Ritter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 16, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The testimony in this case is very meagre. The complainant is a woman seventy-eight years of age, and very obviously suffering from the ravages of time. It is impossible to reconstruct from her testimony, with any degree of certainty, the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction which is the subject of this litigation.

The suit is brought to establish, on behalf of complainant, a trust in a farm situated in Gloucester county, New Jersey, which was acquired by one Frederick Ritter thirty years ago, and to enjoin an ejectment suit at law. Frederick Ritter is now dead.

In 1885…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duvale v. DuvaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Duvale v. DuvaleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896
  3. Yetman v. HedgemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  4. Midmer v. Midmer's ExecutorsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
  5. Samson v. WentworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API