Legal Opinion · Dissent

Volpe v. Volpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2005Published

1Dissent

Hurlbutt, J.P. (dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent in part. I disagree with the conclusion of the majority that the 1981 note in which petitioner wrote “[a]ny money I owe you I can catch up as soon as possible” amounts to a conditional promise to “pay ‘when able’ ” (Lorenzo v Bussin, 7 AD2d 731, 732 [1958], affd 7 NY2d 1039 [1960]). In my view, even if the reference in the note to “[a]ny money I owe you” suffices to “recognize an existing debt” under General Obligations Law § 17-101 (Sitkiewicz v County of Sullivan, 256 AD2d 884, 886 [1998], appeal and lv dismissed 93 NY2d 908…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. House v. HornburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Flynn v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. House v. HornburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Sitkiewicz v. County of SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Hakim v. Peckel Family Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API