Legal Opinion

Brantley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1922No. 13311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court . of Wrightsville — Judge Sturgis presiding. December 20, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwobth, J.

1. By request the judge charged section 31 of the Renal Code of 1910, which declares that “ a crime or misdemeanor shall consist in a violation of a public law, in the commission of which there shall be a union or joint Operation of act and intention, or criminal negligence.” Immediately following this he gave in charge section 32, *537as to how intention is manfested. This was not error. When the judge gives to the jury a charge as requested in writing, it is not erroneous for him to add comments that are pertinent and correct. While intent is an element of the crime of which the accused is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Dotson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Savannah Chemical Co. v. Beagg & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tuten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Herbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API