Legal Opinion

Tuten v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1927No. 17940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwobtii, J.

1. In view of tlie particular facts of this ease and of the entire charge of the court, the judge did not err in charging the jury as follows: “If, however, you should find from the facts and evidence in the case, that the defendant did pick up the whisky, that he did take the whisky into his possessoin, custody and control, took it under such possession and control as to pass it on to another, although the other party only took possession of it for the purpose of taking a drink, I charge you that the party who took the whisky into his possession for the purpose of passing it on to another,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shuford v. ShufordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Barbour v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Brantley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API