Legal Opinion

United States v. Bohanec

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 8, 2016No. Case No. 2:15-CV-4347 DDP (FFMx)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*883FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DEAN D. PREGERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, - United States of America, seeks to collect a civil penalty assessed to Defendants August Bohanec and Maria Bohanec (collectively, “Defendants” or “the Bohances”) for willful failure to report their interest in foreign bank accounts during tax year 2007, as required under 31 U.S.C. § 5314 and its implementing regulations. This matter was tried before the court on November 1,2016. Having considered the submissions and arguments of the parties, as well as the evidence in the record, the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Charles G. Fargo Elizabeth A. Fargo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. GarrityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  2. United States v. HorowitzDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. United States v. FlumeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
  4. Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. United States v. BurgaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API