Kennard v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This Court granted the State's petition for writ of certiorari to decide the following issue:
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly decided that the trial court erred by allowing two witnesses to testify about statements made by one alleged to be the defendant's accomplice that incriminated the defendant in the crime, after defendant's counsel had on cross-examination elicited testimony regarding those statements.
We are of the opinion that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred, and we reverse its judgment.
We set out those facts essential for the purpose of review of this issue, noting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Bank of Phoenix City v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PrasertphongArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kennard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Chavers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.