Legal Opinion
Baker v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1942PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
These are petitions filed under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 258, against the Commonwealth, the first by Baker to recover $8,500 for repairs made on the Holyoke Armory and the second by Kelly to recover $7,400 for similar work performed at the Worcester Armory. The material was supplied and the work was furnished by the petitioners in accordance with written contracts dated October 24, 1938, and executed October 28, 1938, by each of them with the State quartermaster, described therein as “Quartermaster General, Executive Dept.” The general appropriation act enacted in May, 1938, appropriated to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Simpson v. City of MarlboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- McHenry v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Moe v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Adalian Bros. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.