(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASSANDRA B. CHARLES, No. 2:19-cv-02555 KJM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 US OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma 20 pauperis (“IFP”), though her initial complaint was rejected pursuant to the screening process 21 required by the IFP statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); ECF No. 4.…