Legal Opinion
State v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 4, 1984No. 129, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
The construction of § 11-209(a) of the Maryland Antitrust Act, Md.Code (1975, 1983 Repl. Vol.), §§ 11-201 to 11-213 of the Commercial Law Article (the Md.Act) is the principal question presented in this case. 1 The State of Maryland, acting through the Antitrust Division of the Attorney General’s Office and alleging a resale price maintenance conspiracy in raincoats, brought this action under § ll-209(a). The State contends that the section authorizes an equity court to order the alleged price fixer to pay to the State for the benefit of retail purchasers the difference…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- New York v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Davidson v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Krause Marine Towing Corp. v. Ass'n of Maryland PilotsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Commonwealth v. Winegardner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.