Legal Opinion

Berry v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1979No. Appeal, No. 14 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencee,

Clark Berry, Jr. (claimant) left his job to accompany his wife to a new locality. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) ruled that he was ineligible for unemployment benefits by virtue of Section 402(b)(2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b)(2). That section provides as follows:

An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week- — ■(b)(1) ----(2) In which his or her unemployment is due to leaving work (I) to accompany or to join his or her spouse in a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Rinehart v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Taylor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Taylor v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API