Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that Mary B. Mulholland (claimant) did not voluntarily terminate her employment and was therefore eligible for benefits pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §751 et seq. We reverse.

The relevant facts, although somewhat complex, are for the most part undisputed. Claimant was employed by Sears as a record clerk. On March 22,1976, claimant returned from a…