Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrencePregerson, Circuit Judge
In this appeal, we are called on to decide whether the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”) bars Burlington Northern from unilaterally implementing a sniffer dog program designed to restrict alcohol and narcotics use by on-duty railroad workers. The program requires engineers, before embarking on trains from certain yards, to submit their grips to a trained dog to sniff for the presence of controlled substances. Although I concur in the result arrived at by Judge Alarcon’s opinion, I get there by a somewhat different route. First of all, I deal more extensively with the management perogative issued…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.