Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1988No. 85-4138Published

1ConcurrencePregerson, Circuit Judge

In this appeal, we are called on to decide whether the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”) bars Burlington Northern from unilaterally implementing a sniffer dog program designed to restrict alcohol and narcotics use by on-duty railroad workers. The program requires engineers, before embarking on trains from certain yards, to submit their grips to a trained dog to sniff for the presence of controlled substances. Although I concur in the result arrived at by Judge Alarcon’s opinion, I get there by a somewhat different route. First of all, I deal more extensively with the management perogative issued…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API