Legal Opinion

State v. Rawleigh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 3, 2008No. 050343711; A129377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

ORS 813.215(1) and (2) 1 provide that a defendant is ineligible to participate in a diversion agreement following a charge of driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) if, among other things, the defendant has a previous DUII conviction under ORS 813.010 or the “statutory counterpart” to ORS 813.010 in another jurisdiction within the last 10 years. In this case, defendant was charged with DUII, ORS 813.010. He petitioned for a diversion agreement, but the trial court determined that he was ineligible for diversion because of a prior conviction in the State of Washington under a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CredifordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. DonovanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. EscaleraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. HecklerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API