Legal Opinion

Paul Vance Nixon v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 8, 2006No. 01-05-00717-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM NUCHIA, Justice.

Appellant, Paul Vance Nixon, was charged by indictment with the offense of unlawful labeling with one enhancement alleging a prior felony conviction. Without a punishment agreement with the State, appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and true to the enhancement. The trial court found appellant guilty as charged and the enhancement paragraph true and assessed punishment at three years’ confinement. Appellant appealed, contending that his plea was involuntary because the trial court’s admonishment stated an incorrect range of punishment and the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Bruns v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CarnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Carner, Ex Parte KennethCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Carner, Ex Parte KennethCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Jerome McCoy v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API