Legal Opinion

Childress v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1990No. 690-88PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S AND APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of failure to stop and render aid. Article 6701d, §§ 38 & 40, V.A.C.S. The jury found two enhancement paragraphs “true” and assessed his punishment at sixty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

On appeal appellant contended that conviction for the offense of failure to stop and render aid was not susceptible to enhancement under the provisions of V.T. C.A. Penal Code, § 12.42(d). On the strength of the panel opinion on original submission in Gutierrez…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Platter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Leming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Elektro-Mobil Technik GmbH, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  4. Burgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Phifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API