Legal Opinion

Rug Maxx v. Smith, No. Cv99 0066358s (Jul. 26, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 26, 2000No. CV99 0066358SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: CT Page 8745 APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF, RUG MAXX

The plaintiff, Rug Maxx, filed an amended three count complaint on November 18, 1999,1 against the defendant, Richard Smith. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is and was a sole proprietorship doing business as Rug Maxx. The defendant was a principal of and operated a business known as Furniture Expo, Inc. (Furniture Expo), and consigned rugs from the plaintiff. Count one alleges that the defendant breached…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Hallas v. Boehmke & Dobosz, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Tyler v. SchnabelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Town of East Lyme v. WoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API