Cook v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Judge.
The appellant, Roy Cook, was tried in the Muhlenberg Circuit Court, convicted of rape and sentenced to 20 years in the State penitentiary. He now prosecutes an appeal from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict.
The first ground alleged for reversal is the failure of the Commonwealth to elect whether to prosecute on attempted rape or on rápe. This ground was not mentioned .in the motion and grounds for a new trial, and this Court will not consider it for that reason. Lair v. Commonwealth, Ky., 330 S.W.2d 938.
Other grounds relied upon by appellant, except the one hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meade v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Wright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Lair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Hopper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Commonwealth v. LavalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Souder v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. KendricksTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.