Legal Opinion

Barker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1989No. 55863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Judge.

Movant Steven A. Barker appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

On February 3, 1986, Movant entered guilty pleas to one count each of kidnapping, armed criminal action, rape, and sodomy. The trial court thereafter sentenced Movant to consecutive prison terms that totalled thirty-four years.

On May 25, 1988, Movant filed a pro se motion pursuant to Rule 24.035. Following her appointment, counsel for Movant filed a first amended motion, incorporating by reference the original Rule 24.035 motion. On October 26,1988, the motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Branstuder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Chatman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Ahart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Capraro v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Cobb v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Tyler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Broyles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Hohenstreet v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API