Dindio v. Meshaka

This is an action of contract to recover for work and labor performed. The description in the writ as originally framed of the only defendant against whom a finding was made is “George N. Meshaka, also known as N. N. Meshaka also known as Nagee N. Meshaka.” The defendants appeared and answered generally. No plea in abatement was filed. The individual for whom the plaintiff testified that he performed the labor was in court at *114the trial on the merits and was identified by the plaintiff. He was called as a witness by the plaintiff for cross-examination under the statute. (G. L. c. 233, § 22.)…