Legal Opinion
Bateman v. Wood
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1937PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The one of these actions of tort by the female plaintiff (hereafter called the plaintiff) is brought to recover compensation for personal injuries received by her in an automobile accident, and the other by her husband is brought to recover consequential damages. The cases come before us on a consolidated bill of exceptions to a ruling of the trial judge sustaining in each case the plea in abatement of the defendant. The facts material to the issues raised are these: The causes of action arose out of a collision which occurred on October 21, 1932, between an automobile truck owned and alleged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Eaton v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Hanzes v. FlavioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Tyler v. Boot & Shoe Workers UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Choate v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.