Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1993No. 18243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Following nonjury trial defendant-appellant was found guilty of driving while intoxicated and failure to stop at a stop sign. Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support each conviction as the trial court did not “correctly appraise the testimony of David Engersol and Appellant.” Engersol was a witness called at defendant’s request.

Defendant cites one case under his points relied on, State v. Walker, 505 S.W.2d 119 (Mo.App.1973), but does not cite or discuss it in the argument portion of his brief. Other than stating the well known standard of reviewing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rollins v. SchwyhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. City of Springfield v. HinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LauerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. FalconeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API