Legal Opinion

Visconti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike the separate defense that plaintiff’s action is barred by failure to file a timely notice of claim, and also seeks leave to .serve a notice of claim nunc pro tunc. The complaint sets out two causes of action. The first seeks damages for an assault. The complaint alleges that on October 11, 1969, while plaintiff was an incarcerated prisoner in the Manhattan House of Detention following a plea of guilty to a felony indictment, he was assaulted by two other prisoners and that the defendant negligently failed to provide protection. The second cause of action alleges that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. School Board of Union Free District No. 28New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Baronness v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934
  3. Federman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Valente v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Maiello v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API