Department of Revenue v. Joseph Bublick & Sons, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dooley
Here the issue is whether, if a corporation is unable to satisfy its tax liability under the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 120, par. 440 et seq.), post-judgment action must be maintained against that corporation before the individual corporate officers may be called upon to assume this liability.
The controlling statute provides:
“Any officer or employee of any corporation subject to the provisions of this Act who has the control, supervision or responsibility of filing returns and making-payment of the amount of tax herein imposed in accordance with Section 3 of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Harding v. AlbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- People Ex Rel. Nash v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Department of Revenue v. Heartland Investments, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Goranson v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- In Re StoeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.