Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue v. Joseph Bublick & Sons, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1977No. 48528PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dooley

Here the issue is whether, if a corporation is unable to satisfy its tax liability under the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 120, par. 440 et seq.), post-judgment action must be maintained against that corporation before the individual corporate officers may be called upon to assume this liability.

The controlling statute provides:

“Any officer or employee of any corporation subject to the provisions of this Act who has the control, supervision or responsibility of filing returns and making-payment of the amount of tax herein imposed in accordance with Section 3 of this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Harding v. AlbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People Ex Rel. Nash v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Department of Revenue v. Heartland Investments, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Goranson v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. In Re StoeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API