Legal Opinion
Sto Corp. v. Henrietta Building Supplies, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted partial summary judgment to plaintiff dismissing defendant’s first and third counterclaims. The undisputed proof establishes that the parties were unable to agree on terms governing the duration and termination of defendant’s distributorship. The hopes, beliefs and expectations of defendant’s President that the distributorship would continue for at least three years are no substitute for an express agreement to that effect with plaintiff. Absent an agreement with respect to the duration of their relationship,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lamphear v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Estate of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goldberg v. Plaza Nursing Home Comp., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mintz v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Walck Bros. AG. Service, Inc. v. HillockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Erie Materials, Inc. v. Central City Roofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- ERIE MATERIALS, INC. v. CENTRAL CITY ROOFING CO., INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.