State v. Sawyer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
Assignments of Error Nos. 10 and 11 relate to the denial of defendant’s motions for judgments as in case of nonsuit. The rules applicable when testing the sufficiency of the evi dence to withstand a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit have been often stated and need not be repeated. See State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 567, 180 S.E. 2d 755, 759-60 (1971), and cases cited. When considered in the light most favorable to the State, the direct and circumstantial evidence was sufficient to require that it be submitted to the jury in respect of the felonious breaking and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ElkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. DammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.