Legal Opinion

Castelvetro v. Mills, No. Cv91 0320396 (May 21, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 21, 1996No. CV91 0320396Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MILLS DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Certain defendants in this case have filed a motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs here formerly worked for Gravymaster Inc. That corporation leased a building from several defendants in this case which the motion for summary judgment refers to as the Mills defendants. The plaintiffs claim to have become ill due to the manner in which the building they worked in was constructed and maintained. Counts 1 and 3 are directed against the Mills…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers South, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Phillips v. Stowe Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. De Brino v. BenequistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API