Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Tee-Pak, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 5, 1990No. 4-89-0562, 4-89-0669 consPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

This consolidated appeal concerns applications for judgment pursuant to section 19(g) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.19(g)). Plaintiffs’ applications were dismissed on the basis that at the time checks were tendered by the employers and accepted by the plaintiffs, case law did not permit the award of additional interest pursuant to section 2 — 1303 of the Civil Practice Law (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2—1303). Further, the circuit court determined that retroactive application of current case law was not permitted. On appeal, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elg v. WhittingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Board of Commissioners v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Larrance v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Proctor Community Hospital v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. CreteIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Centreville Township HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Kocik v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Kleiboeker v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Moore v. Centreville Township HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API