Legal Opinion
Kocik v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 19, 1993No. 3-92-0095, 3-92-0133, 3-92-0134, 3-92-0135, 3-92-0136, 3-92-0137, 3-92-0138, 3-92-0139 and 3-92-0140PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE McCUSKEY
delivered the opinion of the court:
In nine similar cases, the circuit court of Will County denied the motions filed by the third-party defendants to strike the ad damnum clauses of the third-party complaints. In each case, the trial court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308), certified the issue raised for interlocutory appeal. We have granted the third-party defendants’ applications for leave to appeal and have consolidated the nine cases since they involve the same issue.
The only issue raised in these interlocutory appeals is whether the supreme…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Kotecki v. Cyclops Welding Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Elg v. WhittingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Deichmueller Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Marozas v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS, CITY OF BURBANKAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. Centreville Township HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Alvarez v. Fred Hintze ConstructionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Claudy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Lannom v. KoscoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- John Deere Harvester Works v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.