Legal Opinion
Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 27, 2006No. C 05-4800 PJHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants Joseph Reid and Capitol Bancorp Ltd.’s (“Capitol”) 1 motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“1AC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(b)(6) came on for hearing before this court on October 11, 2006. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authorities, the court GRANTS Capitol’s motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Background
This is a proposed class action alleging violations of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. v. Celera Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- In Re WorldCom, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Varjabedian v. Emulex Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Manger v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.