Legal Opinion

Clemens v. O'BRIEN

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 1964PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

85 N.J. Super. 404 (1964)

204 A.2d 895

MARTHA D. CLEMENS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM F. O'BRIEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 19, 1964.

Decided November 17, 1964.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.

Mr. Garret A. Hobart, IV, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys).

Mr. Richard F. Connors argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lieberman, Gorrin, Connors & Ironson, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

We here deal with the controversial doctrine of automobile…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear InfirmarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Campanella v. ZajicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Stam v. CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API