Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 21, 1990No. NMCM 89 0959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial convicted the appellant of nine specifications of making and delivering checks totaling $249.00 without sufficient funds, in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 923a, and one specification of false swearing in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934.

The military judge sentenced appellant to confinement for 5 months, to forfeit $450.00 pay per month for 5 months, to be reduced to pay grade E-l, and to be discharged with a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. ChairezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. LunsfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. McDowellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. HalleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. CzasterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API