Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This action is upon an accident insurance policy to recover for disability and for the loss of sight of one eye resulting from bodily injuries to the plaintiff caused by a fall on steps.

The declaration alleges that the plaintiff has complied in every particular with the terms of the policy except the provisions in regard to written notice, which the declaration alleges the defendant waived. - The "Standard Provisions” require that written notice of injury be given to the company within twenty days after the date of the accident causing such injury, but they further provide that failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. McCarthy v. RendleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Wilcox v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Rollins v. Boston Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Thompson v. United Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Depot Cafe Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Krasny v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Dunn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Baker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API