Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. In this action of contract the plaintiff, as an insured member, sought reimbursement for a percentage of medical expenses under a policy of group insurance covering accidental bodily injury or sickness issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s employer. The judge found for the defendant. The case turns on the question of compliance by the plaintiff with the requirement as to the filing of notice of claim. The policy provided that “ [w] ritten notice of claim must be given to the company within twenty days after the occurrence or commencement of any loss covered by this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Segal v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. American Ins. Co. of Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Wilcox v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Duggan v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967
  3. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API