State v. Dixon
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.
The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order suppressing a portion of Kevin Dixon’s (“Defendant”) statement and the videotaped demonstration. The State contends the trial court clearly erred in suppressing a portion of Defendant’s statement and the videotaped demonstration because the trial court failed to consider the totality of the circumstances and incorrectly found a promise of leniency was made to Defendant during the interview. We reverse and remand.
On March 24, 2009, an eight-month-old baby boy, was critically injured at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. StokesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Michael B. Casey v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025