Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2010No. ED 95181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.

The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order suppressing a portion of Kevin Dixon’s (“Defendant”) statement and the videotaped demonstration. The State contends the trial court clearly erred in suppressing a portion of Defendant’s statement and the videotaped demonstration because the trial court failed to consider the totality of the circumstances and incorrectly found a promise of leniency was made to Defendant during the interview. We reverse and remand.

On March 24, 2009, an eight-month-old baby boy, was critically injured at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. StokesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Michael B. Casey v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API