Legal Opinion

Doe v. Hinsdale Township High School District 86

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 19, 2009No. 2-08-0199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schostok

The plaintiff, Jane Doe, brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly based upon childhood sexual abuse proximately caused by the defendants, Hinsdale Township High School District 86 (District 86), Roger Miller, James Ferguson, and Robert J. Mueller, Jr. The circuit court of Du Page County dismissed those portions of the plaintiffs complaint that were directed against the first three of these defendants as barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that her action was timely filed under section 13 — 202.2(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Metzger v. DaRosaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Moore v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Tosado v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ferguson v. McKenzieIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woods v. Illinois Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Hampton v. SabieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. 100 Lake v. NovakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Lee v. Naperville Community Unit School District 203Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Segobiano-Morris v. Grayslake Community Consolidated School District No. 46Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API